Open Letter To Law Firm Marketers

Several weeks ago I was part of a discussion on marketing in the legal industry. In the course of the conversation a successful, respected law firm leader looked around the room and announced, “I just don’t get this whole CMO thing.”

His pronouncement wasn’t argumentative or confrontational. He wasn’t lobbying against marketers. He was giving voice to what scores of law firm leaders wrestle with -- the questions of whether the marketing function (whatever it is labeled) in the legal space, is strategic at any level, and where it belongs in the hierarchy of a firm?

To be pointed -- does marketing belong in the so-called C-Suite in law firms, participating in baseline discussions of direction, profitability and growth? Or is the industry served best by top-flight marketing communication teams, able to respond, react, deliver and facilitate communication, media relations, events and the like?

And while it may be pronounced to an uncomfortable degree for marketing professionals in law firms, the underlying issue is not unique to the legal industry.  The fact that in many industries the ultimate office in the Suite -- that of the CEO -- is rarely occupied by one having come through the marketing ranks, is an oft explored issue by senior marketers.  And (editorial comment here) far too frequently our response as marketers is defensive...if not indignant.

There are scores of possible causes for this. The creative, polished and often “event-driven” side of marketing -- from high-end production, to the concept of “spin,” to the degree to which “optics” seem to determine so much -- may give rise to the question, How can one engaged in so much “theater” bring appropriate gravity and perspective to an executive’s role?

Whatever the reason, for all marketers aspiring to leadership, here are three ideas that will change the discussions in your organization.

• First, learn and use the language of those with whom you wish to connect / relate.  Marketing-speak and Financial-speak are (most often) worlds apart.  The verbal shorthand, metaphors, and acronyms of one rarely connect with the other.  Want to lead strategic discussions?  Speak a language that will connect with and be understood by leadership, whatever their respective discipline.
• Remember the organization’s reason for being.  Unless you market an agency or creative shop, it is probably not to win awards for advertising or gain acclaim for design and creative excellence.  Focus efforts on initiatives that directly connect to the mission, and watch the nature of your discussions change.
• Synthesize.  See the big picture.  Avoid (indeed, fight against) the silos that evolve in every organization.  The leaders in technology, finance, and human resources are allies and partners of the successful marketing organization.  And any perspective on strategy is incomplete if it is not a synthesis of every discipline in the organization.

One reason more marketers don’t have a “seat at the table” just might be that we haven’t found the way to connect with our colleagues in Finance, Technology, HR, Professional Development and Strategic Growth -- or whatever the departments in your organization might be.

A bit ironic that the group charged with connecting with the marketplace outside the organization has such difficulty connecting inside, don't you think?  And if we are unable to connect with our colleagues, have we earned the right to an office in the C-Suite?  Should we be shocked or dismayed when leaders "don't get the CMO thing?"

Inspiration, Innovation & Leadership

A few days ago one of my Twitter friends -- Steve Herbert (@steveenjoyslife) -- introcued me to Simon Sinek's presentation titled " How Great Leaders Inspire Action." In this (inspired) video, Sinek explores what he calls the "golden circle" -- in his own words, the world's simplest idea.
The crux of the formula? People don't buy what you do (create, produce, advocate, etc.); they buy why you do it.
Put another way -- people buy the reason you do what you do.
For everyone wanting to market a product or service, inspire a course of action, lead a team, or instigate change, Apple, Dr. Martin Luther King and the Wright brothers are poignant illustrations that what inspires action is not "what", but "why."
Take 19 minutes to watch this video.  You will be encouraged...and inspired to action.

When Marketing Fails

This post is dedicated to anyone who has ever asked (or been on the receiving end of the query) where did our marketing go wrong? 

And the answer is -- perhaps it went awry when the priority became creating, producing and delivering the message as opposed to identifying the precise point at which you might connect with your target.

Somewhere, somehow we began to equate marketing with the execution of creative genius. We recognize it, reward it, hand out killer-awards for it, revere it. And sometimes, inadvertently to be sure, producing the message became the point.  We began thinking of the ability to articulate or produce as the only tools essential to moving a target audience.

Don't misunderstand: I firmly believe creativity in all of its manifestations is a critical piece of the puzzle. Great copy, killer production value, insightful market segmentation and innovative media plans scarcely scratch the surface of essential creative components. But if the message doesn't emanate from the kind of listening that precisely identifies the point of connection -- shared experiences, concerns, aspirations -- we should not be surprised when the market barely moves in our direction. 

What might happen if, for a season, we invested in innovative listening? What if we found a way to lend our mind's ear to our clients/customers/targets (as opposed to engaging in a profunctary exercise)?

This is the essence of Intentional Listening. It employs the creative (and opportunistic) resources of the mind's ear to the fullest extent. This kind of listening is a relentless quest for common ground and points of connection.

Call it market research if conventional labels are more comfortable. By any label, this is the seed of succcess for our marketing efforts. Intently listen, and the market will reveal what it cares about, what it is searching for, and what it takes to sew seeds of loyal, enduring relationships.

Armed with this kind of baseline information, we might surprise even ourselves with the impact creative and innovative communication has on the bottom-line.

A Requiem For Relationships

There is no shortage of information and advice on relationships.  What it takes to make them work, fix them when they’re broken, build them, nurture them, leverage them. Counselors, coaches, philosophers, and theologians, all have devoted volumes to the subject.

Seldom will anyone whisper, let alone proclaim the truth: relationships don’t work.

I know -- the initial reaction is to vehemently deny this, and label the idea as the voice of pessimism, if not sheer heresy. This was certainly the response I clung to when first presented with compelling evidence to the contrary. But consider the evidence for a moment. Pick the arena -- from the closest of personal, to casual or social, to the heart of the professional marketplace -- relationships call for an unselfish perspective.

And how’s that worked for most of us? We are, across the spectrum, most often “in it to win.” The idea of being unselfish seems counter to everything that matters. Oh sure, best intentions define the early stages of the relationships we deem important -- at the personal and business level. But, when in the course of normal events, competing interests surface -- ah, there is the rub!

Of course, some of these “competing” instances are little more than trivial bouts born of (to be charitable) unique perspectives. If the relationship is important enough, at least one party finds a way to defer. But when these interests are seeded in a value system, or -- often more devastating -- a profit margin -- compromise, let alone deference becomes exponentially more difficult.

In these moments, whether with a significant other, a once-valued business partner, or a former key client, the instinct to win...to protect position...to self preserve takes over. And relationships tear. Or break. Or shatter.

Wow! That is gloom and doom...right?

Not so fast. What if a relationship constitutes the ultimate counter-intuitive? What if the foundation for a successful relationship is in knowing that, left to the normal course of things, relationships don’t work?

This, of course, is not a new idea. “For it is in giving that we receive.”

When marketers and strategists tap into this dynamic, the market tends to change. This is, after all, the principle at the heart of all the talk about listening, dialogue, and (we need a new term for this) customer satisfaction. This is not to imply that business relationships or the nurture of personal networks is ever easy, or that there exists a quick fix; but watch what happens when enterprise seeks a way to give something back...even in the smallest of increments.

At the personal level, all I know is that the most cherished relationships I have are the byproducts of forgiveness, charity and immeasurable unselfishness on the part of others. For these, I am most thankful.

And on a day when many celebrate a new beginning, whatever your faith, and however you choose to view the tremendous possibility, I am grateful that the impossible is possible. Relationships can -- indeed, do work.

Where Have All The Leaders Gone?

Anecdotal evidence is dangerous. But current events (micro and macro level) beg the question: Just when we need it the most, where has real leadership gone?

Significant global unrest appears perpetual. Economic crisis inhibits dialogue around everything from national initiatives to local education. Infrastructures that facilitate so much of what is deemed essential seem stretched beyond reasonable limits.

Yet, those seated in the centers of power – political, social, private enterprise, all – seem impotent when it comes to effecting positive change.

Where is the brand of leadership that sees beyond its own street, neighborhood or village? Do leaders anywhere possess a world view born of an understanding that, while each community is made up of a multitude of perspectives, the threads of shared aspirations are strong enough to bind us together.

Without respect to your sphere of relationships, influence and operation, if you run into a leader that meets the following criteria you’ll be ahead of the game if you tap into their experience and perspective. If you own or run a company, hire them. This kind of leadership is, at best, a lost art.

Characteristics of a Leader

1. Big Picture Perspective. Whether a Manager, an occupant of the C-Suite, or a representative of “the people,” leadership cultivates and maintains perspective that transcends personal or parochial opinions and experiences. Driving an agenda rooted in narrow interests rarely gives rise to significant and lasting change.

2. Doesn’t Roam the Neighborhood Marking Fire Hydrants. If you’re searching for leadership, run when you encounter someone that invests time staking out territory. This never goes hand-in-hand with collaboration and consensus building.

3. Builds Teams. Leadership understands, whether intuitively or experientially, that winning requires a team. From governments to corporate giants to garage entrepreneurs, the best leaders rally support and leverage resources. They do not operate on (or seek to “mark”) an island. Leaders who do not believe in the greater potential of a team should be relieved of duty. Fire ‘em.

(By the way, the ability to build teams goes hand-in-hand with accepting responsibility -- versus blaming all ills on the shortcomings of someone else.)

4. Possess and Inspire Vision. A verse in Proverbs observes that “where there is no vision, the people perish.” If you wonder whether you are a leader or whether your enterprise has leaders in every area, look for the vision. The absence of vision equates to the absence of leadership. On the other hand, the ability to inspire vision is linked to the ability to identify and tap into shared aspirations.

5. Values Listening and Learning over Hyperbole. Somewhere along the line we began to think of personal charisma and the ability to articulate a message as earmarks of a great leader. We manage to overlook that these characteristics have been shared by some of history’s greatest scam artists. This is not to demean the importance of being able to communicate. Rather, it is to remind us that what we most need in leaders today – the ability to find common ground between multiple diverse experiences, collaborative skills, a visionary perspective – are grounded in understanding. And understanding comes from listening. Have someone masquerading as a leader, but unwilling to collaborate and listen? Fire ‘em.

We select leaders in a number of different ways, depending on the venue. But perhaps one of the reasons leadership seems in short supply in so many circles is that we have forgotten what it looks like. Charisma, titles, access, economic might – none of these, leaders make.

What would you add to this list of characteristics?

Enough Talk About Listening!

If you interact with a significant other, a neighbor, team members or co-workers, no one needs to tell you that listening is critical to almost any relationship.

What we must not overlook is the fact that all listening is not equal.  Query your favorite search engine for “types of listening” and you’ll find plenty of content on Discriminating (I-get-to-pick-and-choose), Passive (I’m-not-really-engaged) and a handful of other labels that seem like attempts to quantify the fact that sometimes we listen; often we fake it.

It is not difficult to make a case for Discriminating Listening in selected situations.  After all, it is almost impossible to find a market segment that is not flooded with messages, each making as big a splash as possible in pursuit of mind share.  The art of communication often seems inexorably linked to the metrics of media buys, production costs and decibels.  The result can be deafening.

And with all the talk about the subject, one can’t help wondering whether marketers are listening.

An Opportunity to Reinvent

Few will admit it, but the proof is in the execution of strategies.  Most strategies indicate that messaging is what we value most.

While we focus on the creation and delivery of the message we ignore at least two things central to the most basic communication theory:

Like it or not (and many struggle mightily with this) the basic building block of communication is the dynamism of shared experiences.  Shared experience is the byproduct of interaction, participation, and collaboration.  It does not begin with messaging.

Enter Intentional Listening – listening by design, with purpose, with ears wide open.  This is the opportunity and potential of Social Media.

And though the irony of talking about it this much is not lost, here is fodder for what can hopefully be an on-going discussion around one of the most critical practices if you're venturing into social media.

Five Keys to Intentional Listening

1.     Begin by asking “to whom should we be listening?” as opposed to “what should we be saying?”  Somewhere in the course of the media age we have come to equate the best communication solely with message creation and delivery.  And though this is not to say that the quality of messaging is not critical, it is to suggest that perhaps we have placed the proverbial cart before the horse.  The most successful marketing always begins with target identification and research.

2.     Take note (scrupulously) of what your target audience cares about.  Review tweet streams, examine past posts, and browse lists of friends and followers.  This “listening” will yield some of the best marketing intelligence available – a glimpse into what your market values and invests in.

It 

3.     Build on shared experiences.  Listen carefully and your market will tell you exactly what it takes to connect.  Build your connection strategy around shared experiences, interests, values and common needs.  (If you are unable to identify this point of connection, return to number 1.)

4.     Remember the arithmetic.  Listen more than you talk…at minimum, two times more.  Practically speaking, retweet more than you tweet your own message, ask questions that promote conversations around what your target market values.  If the only time you seek interaction or feedback is when you want to precipitate action on your behalf, your arithmetic is wrong.  Intentional Listening is about what it takes to build relationship.  It is not about exploiting a podium or pulpit.  In short, give more than you expect to receive.

5.     Help build.  Community is the life-blood of social media.  Help build it and, with deference to the better mousetraps that might come along, your market will beat a path to your door.  Build connections.  Invest more time in a cause, event or idea that is important to your market than you do in asking targets to join your cause, and you’re on the road to relationships based on shared experiences.  And there is dynamism in there.

This is the challenge for social media strategists: do we view this evolving arena as a message delivery media, or do we see it for what it is – a way to invest in Intentional Listening.  The former view squanders the potential, turning social media presence into little more than a firestorm of sound bites.

Practice Intentional Listening and we’re on the road to shared experiences, valued collaboration, relationships that endure – and yes, loyal friends, fans, clients and customers.

What Really Matters?

Some things simply are not important in the scope of things.

Mac or PC? Important to the respective companies, to be sure; but give me either and I’ll get the job done. Number of Twitter followers or Facebook friends? Great possibilities; but not near as important as how you treat those you’re connected to -- online or face-to-face.

Pro sports contract negotiations, college bowl selections -- 90% of what fills an hour of sports talk radio or sports center highlights -- important to the individuals and enterprises they touch, yes. But is the amount of time invested by many of us on such issues just a bit out of proportion?

Red state, blue state, left side of the aisle, right side of the brain -- are the things we invest so much time cussing and discussing -- are these things (or are the conversations we’re having about them) as important as the time we spend on them?

This is not to say that purchasing decisions, the thrill of victory and the body politic don’t warrant attention, or to suggest they have no importance.

But (thankfully) every so often I am reminded that it is more important to be quiet for a moment, and consider what really matters.

Time with friends and family really matters.

Experiencing what happens to human beings when we give of ourselves -- this is important. Nothing will change a community more quickly. I would certainly do better to shift some of my sports or political talk time to efforts here.

What others think of you is rarely as important as what you, deep in your heart, think of yourself.

And simply pausing for a few minutes to consider the very few things that really matter -- this is one of the most important things we can do today.